Centers of Excellence (CoEs)

A Center of Excellence (CoE) is a group of people with specialized skills and expertise whose job is to provide leadership and purposely disseminate that knowledge within your organization.  CoEs should not be confused with Communities of Practice (CoPs), discussed later, are sometimes referred to as guilds.  In the last few years we’ve seen Agile CoEs, Testing CoEs, DevOps CoEs, and Architecture CoEs created within organizations to help their continuous improvement efforts.

This article addresses the following topics:

Why CoEs?

A Center of Excellence (CoE) is typically formed to address a skills/knowledge deficit within an organization.  The members of a CoE are coaches, so an Agile CoE is a collection of agile coaches, a testing CoE a collection of testing coaches, and so on.  CoE coaches will be involved with many of the activities of Continuous Improvement:

  1. Identifying techniques.  Coaches will work with one another, and with the people that they are coaching, to identify potential techniques (practices, strategies, principles) that they can help people to adopt to improve the way that they work.
  2. Sharing techniques.  Coaches will help practitioners to share techniques that they find effective with one another.  Helping to build a learning organization is the primary way for CoE coaches to scale their efforts and better yet work their way out of job.
  3. Capturing techniques.  CoE coaches will work with practitioners to capture viable techniques so as to build organizational memory around their processes and strategies.
  4. Supporting teams. The primary mission for CoE coaches is to support individual and team learning.  As you can see in the goal diagram below, there is a wide range of strategies available to you.
  5. Organizing CoPs.  Very often a CoE will initiate, or at least support the initiation of, one or more communities of practice (CoP) to aid their educational efforts.  For example, an Agile CoE may help to organize an Agile CoE, an Agile Testing CoE, a Lean Architecture CoE, and many others.
  6. Governing improvement.  A CoE will often collect and track a collection of metrics to help them both govern and to justify your organization’s investment in the CoE.

Disciplined Agile Continuous Improvement


Forming CoEs

A CoE will be formed by identifying people who have the skills/knowledge, the ability to coach and likely train people, and who have the drive to continue learning on their own.  The following table compares and contrasts common strategies for finding CoE coaches.

Strategy Advantages Disadvantages
Hire from within The person is known and (hopefully) respected within your organization

The person knows how to navigate your organizational environment

May not have experienced the CoE’s topic outside of your organization, and as a result may struggle with “that’s the way it’s done here” type issues

May still be wrapped up in the activities of their existing position

Often new to being a CoE coach

Hire new employees Brings a new viewpoint and fresh experiences into your organization

Often has CoE coaching experience

Can be very hard to find, particularly if you don’t already have people experienced in the CoE topic to help you identify viable candidates

Can be difficult to get rid of a full time employee (FTE) if they don’t work out

Hire consultants/contractors Easier to find candidates to choose from because many experts choose to become consultants

There may be opportunity to hire the person as a full time employee (FTE) once you’ve tried them out

Difficult to identify this type of person if you don’t already have people experienced in the CoE topic to help you identify viable candidates

CoEs will self organize, and within larger CoEs a Team Lead, often called a CoE Lead, will emerge to guide the team.


CoEs and Other Teams

CoEs have close relationships with, and overlapping membership with, two other types of teams:

  1. Communities of Practice (CoPs). A Community of Practice (CoP) is a collection of people who share a craft or profession who have banded together to ‘learn’ from each other to develop themselves and often even the  organization.  The primary difference between a CoE and a CoP is that a CoE is often purposefully created by an organization with funded members whose full-time job is to coach, teach, and mentor people whereas CoPs are voluntary efforts that typically aren’t funded.  CoPs, because of their voluntary nature, often last much longer than CoEs and may be the end result of a CoE once its official funding disappears.
  2. Work teams.  Very often there will be work teams within your organization whose purpose is to perform the some or all of the work activities supported by a CoE.  For example, your organization may have an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team (or simply an architecture team) whose actual purpose is to evolve and support your EA strategy.  In parallel you may also have an Architecture CoE helping people to learn and share architecture skills and even an Architecture CoP.  Note that a CoE is a type of work team.

Membership in teams